eLearning Design for Older Adults
This research examines how to optimize the design of asynchronous elearning courses and platforms to align with the strengths, needs, and preferences of older adult learners aged 55 and over. Grounded in theories of andragogy and constructive alignment, the study explores evidence-based principles to make online education more accessible, engaging, and empowering for mature learners across the cognitive lifespan.
Grounding Research References
Abdullateef, S. T. (2022). COVID-19: Pedagogical shift, and the rise of divergent approaches. The Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 836.
​
Bernacki, M. L., Greene, M. J., & Lobczowski, N. G. (2021). A systematic review of research on personalized learning: Personalized by whom, to what, how, and for what purpose(s)? Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1675-1715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09615-8
​
Boot, W., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Rogers, W. A. (2020). Designing for older adults: Case studies, methods, and tools. CRC Press.
​
Caskurlu, S., Maeda, Y., Richardson, J. C., & Lv, J. (2020). A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students’ satisfaction and learning. Computers and Education, 157, 103966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103966
​
Chaipidech, P., Srisawasdi, N., Kajornmanee, T., & Chaipah, K. (2022). A personalized learning system-supported professional training model for teachers’ TPACK development. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100064
​
Charters, M., & Murphy, C. (2021). Taking art school online in response to COVID 19: From rapid response to realising potential. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 40(4), 723-735. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12384
​
DeAngelis, T. (2021). Optimizing tech for older adults. American Psychology Association, 52(5), 54. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2021/07/tech-older-adults
​
Duncan, A., & Joyner, D. (2022). On the necessity (or lack thereof) of digital proctoring: Drawbacks, perceptions, and alternatives. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1482-1496. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12700
​
Fang, M. L., Canham, S. L., Battersby, L., Sixsmith, J., Wada, M., & Sixsmith, A. (2019). Exploring Privilege in the Digital Divide: Implications for Theory, Policy, and Practice. The Gerontologist, 59(1), e1–e15. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny037
​
Eynon, R., & Malmberg, L. (2021). Lifelong learning and the internet: Who benefits most from learning online? British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 569-583. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13041
​
Ferguson, L., Sain, D., Kürüm, E., Strickland-Hughes, C. M., Rebok, G. W., & Wu, R. (2023). One-year cognitive outcomes from a multiple real-world skill learning intervention with older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 27(11), 2134-2143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2023.2197847
​
Gerdes, E. P. (2022). Make lifelong learning real: In serving older adults, higher ed institutions benefit, too. Liberal Education, 108(1), 4.
​
Kim, H., Freddolino, P. P., & Greenhow, C. (2023). Older adults' technology anxiety as a barrier to digital inclusion: A scoping review. Educational Gerontology, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2023.2202080
​
Li, R., Geng, J., Yang, R., Ge, Y., & Hesketh, T. (2022). Effectiveness of computerized cognitive training in delaying cognitive function decline in people with mild cognitive impairment: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(10), e38624-e38624. https://doi.org/10.2196/38624
​
Li, Y., Ghazilla, R. A. R., & Abdul-Rashid, S. H. (2022). QFD-based research on sustainable user experience optimization design of smart home products for the elderly: A case study of smart refrigerators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 13742. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113742
​
Lu, J., Xiong, J., Tang, S., Bishwajit, G., & Guo, S. (2023). Social support and psychosocial well-being among older adults in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMJ open, 13(7), e071533. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071533
​
Lu, Y., Hong, X., & Xiao, L. (2022). Toward high-quality adult online learning: A systematic review of empirical studies. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 14(4), 2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042257
​
Knowles, M. S. (1984). Theory of andragogy.
​
Mace, R. A., Mattos, M. K., & Vranceanu, A. (2022). Older adults can use technology: Why healthcare professionals must overcome ageism in digital health. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 12(12), 1102-1105. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibac070
​
Mannheim, I., Wouters, E. J. M., van Boekel, L. C., & van Zaalen, Y. (2021). Attitudes of health care professionals toward older adults' abilities to use digital technology: Questionnaire study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), e26232-e26232. https://doi.org/10.2196/26232
​
Martin, F., Chen, Y., Moore, R. L., & Westine, C. D. (2020). Systematic review of adaptive learning research designs, context, strategies, and technologies from 2009 to 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1903-1929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09793-2
​
Papi-Galvez, N., & La Parra-Casado, D. (2023). Age-based digital divide: Uses of the internet in people over 54 years old. Media and Communication (Lisboa), 11(3), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6744
​
Pappas, M. A., Demertzi, E., Papagerasimou, Y., Koukianakis, L., Voukelatos, N., & Drigas, A. (2019). Cognitive-based E-learning design for older adults. Social Sciences (Basel), 8(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8010006
​
Perrin, A., & Atske, S. (2021). 7% of Americans Don’t Use the Internet. Who are they?. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/04/02/7-of-americans-dont-use-the-internet-who-are-they/
​
Pew Research Center, April 2014, “Older Adults and Technology Use” Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adults-and-technology-use/
​
Ramirez, A., & Inga, E. (2022). Educational innovation in adult learning considering digital transformation for social inclusion. Education Sciences, 12(12), 882. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120882
​
Ryu, S. (2020). The role of mixed methods in conducting design-based research. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1794871
​
Seale, J. (2020). Accessibility frameworks and Models: Exploring the Potential for a Paradigm shift. Improving accessible digital practices in higher education (pp. 45-72). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37125-8_3
​
Seale, J. (2020). New designs or new practices? multiple perspectives on the ICT and Accessibility conundrum. Improving accessible digital practices in higher education (pp. 99-115). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37125-8_5
​
Sharifi, H., & Chattopadhyay, D. (2023). Senior technology learning preferences model for mobile technology. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(MHCI), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3604269
​
Åšlósarz L, BÅ‚aszczyÅ„ski K, Švecová M and Kobylarek A (2022) Adult education needs inventory: Construction and application. Front. Psychol. 13:1035283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035283
​
Stanney, K.M., Skinner A., & Hughes C. (2023) Exercisable Learning-Theory and Evidence-Based Andragogy for Training Effectiveness using XR (ELEVATE-XR): Elevating the ROI of Immersive Technologies, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39:11, 2177-2198, DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2188529
​
Vogels, E. A. (2021). Some digital divides persist between rural, urban and suburban America. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/08/19/some-digital-divides-persist-between-rural-urban-and-suburban-america/
​
World Health Organization. (2022). Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health